| Filed Date | | AdvNo | Debtor | Issue |
| 1/18/2019 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Whether “cause” exists as contemplated under 11 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(1), such that a Chapter 11 trustee should be appointed in lieu of the debtor in possession, or whether such appointment of a trustee is in the interests of creditors as contemplated under 11 U.S.C. § 1104(a)(2). |
| 10/18/2018 | 16-27850 | 16-00260 and 16-0026 | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable? |
| 9/26/2018 | 13-29432 | 18-00104 | Terry Lyle Clothier and Barbara Jean Clothier | Whether the tolling provision of § 507(a)(8)(A)(ii) applies to § 507(a)(8)(A)(i). |
| 8/27/2018 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Employment of special counsel under 11 U.S.C. § 327(a) and/or (e) |
| 8/24/2018 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Can derivative standing be granted retroactively? |
| 8/10/2018 | 13-29432 | 18-00104 | Terry & Barbara Clothier | Whether the tolling provision of 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8)(A)(ii)(II) applies to all of § 507(a)(8)(A) or only § 507(a)(8)(A)(ii). |
| 7/6/2018 | 17-24122 | 17-00171 | Derek Evins Denman and Marnie Danell Denman | Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7056 and Objection to Discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) |
| 7/2/2018 | 18-24703 | | Sherita Arleen Clinton-Briscoe | Whether the debtor had the protection of the automatic stay when the debtor's home was sold at foreclosure? |
| 7/2/2018 | 18-24703 | 18-00134 | Sherita Arleen Clinton-Briscoe | Whether the debtor had the protection of the automatic stay when the debtor's home was sold at foreclosure? |
| 2/5/2018 | 17-20506 | 17-00078 | Willie Earl West | Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7056 and Dischargeability of Student Loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8) |
| 12/5/2017 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Employment of special counsel under 11 U.S.C. § 327(e) |
| 12/5/2017 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Employment of special counsel under 11 U.S.C. § 327(e) |
| 11/2/2017 | 15-31133 | | No Place Like Home, Inc. | Whether a party may obtain the tax returns of another party when those tax returns have no real relevancy to the underlying matter beyond simply possibly impeaching the credibility of that party? |
| 10/4/2017 | 14-22960 | 16-00075 | Opus Medical Management, LLC | Whether this court should impose sanctions (e.g., rendering a default judgment) pursuant to FED. R. BANKR. P. 7037 and FED. R. CIV. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vi) on a party, who assertedly failed to sufficiently comply with the court’s prior Order compelling that party to respond to the discovery requests of the creditor by a date certain. |
| 9/19/2017 | 17-20334 | | Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks Harris | There are four issues in this case: (1) what should be the amount of the § 722 redemption value of the vehicle and how much time should the debtor have to pay the creditor the allowed secured claim in order to redeem the vehicle; (2) whether the creditor should be granted relief from the § 362(d) automatic stay (and related matters); (3) whether the debtor willfully violated this court’s order requiring the court to impose sanctions against her; and (4) whether the debtor should be granted a Chapter 7 discharge at this time under § 727(a). |
| 3/27/2017 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Whether the bankruptcy court should stay two of its prior orders pending their appeal under FED. R. BANKR. P. 8007(a)(1)? |
| 1/11/2017 | 16-27850 | | William H. Thomas, Jr. | Whether this Court clearly erred creating a manifest injustice by granting a creditor’s prior motion for relief from the § 362(a) automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code and another creditor’s motion for joinder thereto, such that the Order should be altered or amended pursuant to F.R.B.P. 9023, under the particular facts and circumstances and applicable law of this specific case. |
| 10/27/2016 | 15-31133 | | No Place Like Home, Inc. | Federal Arbitration Act: whether an arbitrator or the bankruptcy court should hear, determine, and liquidate wage and hour law claims that arose prior to the filing of the Chapter 11 case and deal with non-bankruptcy law? |
| 8/8/2016 | 14-23043 | | LaRhonda Kaye Robertson | Informational memorandum regarding the best practices before this court when an attorney, other than the original attorney of record, converts a case from Chapter 13 to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Cody without first obtaining the original attorney of record's consent or filing a motion to seek to be substituted as attorney of record on behalf of the debtor |
| 6/10/2016 | 15-23544 | 15-00237 | Robert Clark Wheeler | Whether the debtor committed either a fraudulent act, false representation, or a “willful and malicious injury” as contemplated by 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2) and/or (a)(6), such that the underlying debt and resulting State Court judgment owed to the plaintiffs should be declared a statutory exception to the debtor's general Chapter 7 discharge |
| 10/26/2015 | 12-26347 | | E/Doc Systems, Inc. | Whether the fees and expenses sought by attorney for professional services rendered throughout the course of his representation of E/Doc are reasonable and necessary, and thus allowable as a 11 U.S.C. § 503(b) administrative expense |
| 8/11/2015 | 09-20539 | 13-00522 | Ramco-Remodel America Corp. | Whether a postpetition, court approved lump sum cash payment of $5,000 from Ramco to the Wallises constituted a full and complete satisfaction and resolution of a prepetition claim that the Wallises asserted against Ramco, a corporate entity, and also Les W. Stone, president of Ramco, or, instead, whether the $5,000 payment was merely and solely consideration for the
withdrawal of the vote cast by the Wallises rejecting confirmation of the corporate plan of reorganization proposed by Ramco. |
| 7/1/2015 | 13-32671 | 14-00120 | KEITH TRAVIS HAYNES and JENNY KAY HAYNES | Whether a debt owed should be excepted from the general discharges under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2), (4), and (6) and whether attorney fees should be awarded to the successful debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(d) |
| 5/7/2015 | 09-20539 | 13-00522 | Ramco-Remodel America Corp. | Whether the attorney for Ramco, may testify at the trial of this adversary proceeding as to the substance of the postpetition communications exchanged between himself and the former attorney for the Wallises, who is now deceased, that ultimately gave rise to a Consent Order entered into by these parties, which resulted in the withdrawal of the Wallises rejection of Ramco’s Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. |
| 12/16/2014 | 14-26711 | | LaShandra Michelle Turner | Whether prepetition child support arrearages that are owed to the debtor, and are listed in her Schedule B, are property of the debtor's chapter 13 estate under 11 U.S.C. §§ 541 and 1306. |
|
